Culturally informed developmental pediatric care: A qualitative study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Paediatricians deliver developmental care through surveillance, diagnosis, management, and advocacy. Although developmental concerns are among the most common reasons for paediatric visits, care in this area is complex, intersecting medical, mental health, and educational systems. Increasing international migration, persistent health inequities, and diverse cultural concepts of child development require paediatricians to build skills for culturally informed care. However, there is limited research describing how paediatricians perceive and navigate cultural factors when providing developmental care, and how current training and systems support or hinder this. This qualitative study explored paediatricians' perceptions of providing culturally informed developmental care to diverse populations. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with paediatricians who primarily provide developmental care, to understand perceived challenges, opportunities, and educational needs. Thematic analysis of transcribed interviews used both inductive and deductive approaches. Results Eighteen interviews yielded three major themes. First, cultural translation encompassed language barriers, use of interpreters, and trust-building within physician-family relationships. Second, inequity described systemic barriers faced by diverse families, power imbalances in healthcare, and the pandemic's amplification of inequities. Third, educational opportunities highlighted the value of reflective practice, immersive experiences in diverse settings, and building communities of practice to strengthen cultural competence. Conclusion Paediatricians described unique aspects of developmental care that may benefit from practice changes and curriculum reform. Enhanced training in interpreter use, multicultural health brokers, and care coordination teams is recommended. Peer mentorship from diverse colleagues may reduce stereotypes and broaden perspectives. Infrastructure to monitor and close culturally based health gaps is a critical priority for developmental paediatrics in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".