MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116889303 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108401

EEG low conventional bands non‐linear machine learning‐based analysis for Classifying MCI and sleep quality as a function of brain complexity

2025· article· en· W7116889303 on OpenAlexaff
Lucía Penalba‐Sánchez, Pedro Baptista Ribeiro, Mark Crook‐Rumsey, Alexander Sumich, Christina Howard, Saeid Sanei, Ahmad Zandbagleh, Hamed Azami, Emrah Düzel, Dorothea Hämmerer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyNeocortexNeuroimagingBrain functionSleep (system call)Pattern recognition (psychology)Quality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Good sleep quality is essential for both physiological and mental health. It helps in clearing TAU and beta-amyloid aggregates and consolidating memory, key processes in delaying dementia. Poor sleep is linked to reduced cognitive flexibility in daily life, likely due to decreased brain complexity, reflecting a reduced range of adaptive spatiotemporal brain dynamics. This study introduces a novel approach using non-linear EEG analysis focused on low conventional bands to classify sleep quality in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on brain complexity. METHOD: Resting-state EEG was collected from 22 participants with MCI aged 60+, grouped by sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index): 11 MCI with good sleep, and 11 MCI with poor sleep (Table 1). EEG data (128 channels, 5-minute recordings) were normalized and decomposed using the Discrete Wavelet Transform to reach delta (1-4 Hz) and theta (4-8 Hz) bands. Ten non-linear complexity features, namely approximate entropy, correlation dimension, detrended fluctuation analysis, energy, Higuchi fractal dimension, Hurst exponent, Katz fractal dimension, Boltzmann Gibbs entropy, Lyapunov exponent and Shannon entropy, were extracted from 5 second segments. Statistical measures (mean, standard deviation, 95th percentile, variance, median, kurtosis) were computed from these time-distribution features. These statistics were then used for training and testing a set of classic machine learning classifiers, employing leave-one-out cross-validation (Figure 2). RESULTS: Brain complexity successfully classified sleep quality in MCI, achieving an accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of 1 in channel D13 (delta subband) using Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), and an accuracy of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.95 in channel B17 (theta subband) using the Extra Trees Classifier (ETC) (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: Specific machine learning classifiers distinguish excellently sleep quality in MCI using spatiotemporal complexity features from slow EEG subbands. The most relevant channels for group discrimination were primarily located in bilateral temporal regions of the neocortex known to be among the first affected in amnestic MCI, as previously shown in neuroimaging studies. Future longitudinal studies could investigate whether changes in brain complexity within these slow-frequency temporal regions, influenced by sleep quality, are associated with an earlier or faster onset of dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207