MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116894450 · doi:10.1177/16878132251407142

An integrated computational fluid dynamics and chemical kinetics modeling for predicting oil degradation in maritime diesel engines

2025· article· en· W7116894450 on OpenAlexafffund
Leonardo Barcenas, R. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mechanical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLubricants and Their Additives
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultiphysicsLubricantComputational fluid dynamicsCrankshaftCombustionDiesel fuelDiesel engineFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript presents an integrated approach combining chemical kinetics modeling with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation to investigate oil degradation during the operation of a maritime diesel engine MTU 10V 2000 M72. Using COMSOL Multiphysics 6.2, a detailed 2D simulation was performed to model key engine components, including the main journal bearings, connecting rod journal bearings, piston, and oil pan. Three key parameters were analyzed: heat of combustion, crankshaft rotational speed, and oil flow rate. Results demonstrate that while heat of combustion has a moderate impact on oil lifespan, rotational speed significantly affects degradation due to its influence on temperature and flow conditions. The oil flow rate resulted as the most critical factor, with higher flow rates effectively reducing oil temperature and extending its lifespan by minimizing exposure to elevated temperatures. This study highlights the complex interplay between heat generation, flow dynamics, and chemical degradation, providing insights for improved lubricant performance, predictive maintenance strategies, and enhanced engine reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Mechanical EngineeringSame topicLubricants and Their AdditivesFrench-language works237,207