MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116894972 · doi:10.2196/84313

The Effectiveness of Frontal Plane Adaptability in a Novel Foot Prosthesis: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

2025· article· en· W7116894972 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stephanie L. Carey, M Jason Highsmith, Saifullah Farrag, Molly C. Gries, Katheryn J. Allyn, Andrew Humbert, Donald Fogelberg, James M. Colvin, Matthew M. Wernke, Murray E. Maitland

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Clinical trialFoot (prosody)AdaptabilityCrossoverCrossover studyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether a novel prosthetic foot with a polycentric ankle, which offers side-to-side adaptability, improves mobility and daily performance in individuals with (1) unilateral above-knee amputation, (2) unilateral below-knee amputation with a lower mobility level (K2) , or (3) bilateral amputation, any level of amputation. Traditional prostheses are primarily designed for forward walking and lack adaptability for navigating uneven terrain, turning, and executing other multidirectional tasks, often resulting in pain, instability, and limited function. Objective: The objective of this testing protocol is to better understand the functional impact of a novel foot design that offers more inversion/eversion rotation of the polycentric ankle. Although the foot has the potential to address mobility challenges, it is unknown whether people with different amputations and mobility levels respond differently. Methods: The study includes community-based mobility assessments, standardized questionnaires, and participant feedback. Although side-to-side adaptability prosthetic feet have shown benefits for highly active users, this study aims to evaluate the impact on individuals with more significant mobility limitations. Results: Results may guide prosthetic prescription, expand access to advanced prosthetic technology, and inform reimbursement policies, particularly benefiting veterans and service members with combat-related amputations. The study began recruiting in October 2023; as of September 2025, there were 66 participants (17 below the knee, 34 above the knee, and 15 bilateral) who completed the protocol. The clinical trial is expected to be completed by March 2027. Dissemination of results is expected to be completed by December 2027. Conclusions: This procedural study presents a model for evaluating prosthetic feet and other mobility-assistive technologies in real-world contexts, supporting broader efforts to match components to user needs through clinical trials that are grounded in both functional performance and user experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207