MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116902251 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_099830

Alcohol Consumption and Mild Behavioral Impairment

2025· article· en· W7116902251 on OpenAlexaff
Ibadat Warring, Dylan X. Guan, Maryam Ghahremani, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlcohol consumptionDementiaAlcoholConsumption (sociology)Alcohol and healthCognitive impairmentAlcohol intake

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that identifies individuals at high risk for dementia. Alcohol consumption is a modifiable risk factor for dementia, yet its relationship with MBI remains unexplored. This study examines the association between alcohol consumption and MBI symptom severity in dementia-free older adults, hypothesizing that greater alcohol consumption would correlate with more severe MBI symptoms. METHOD: Cross-sectional data for 300 participants aged ≥50 years were obtained from the Comprehensive Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Dementia (COMPASS-ND) study (Figure 1). MBI was assessed using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C), with total and domain-specific scores (decreased motivation, affective dysregulation, impulse dyscontrol, social inappropriateness, and abnormal perception/thought content). Alcohol consumption was operationalized using the Alcohol Use Severity (AUS) score, a composite measure of weekly drinking amount and frequency relative to five years ago (Table 1). Associations between AUS and MBI-C scores were analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial models, adjusted for age, sex, education, and cognitive status. A sex*AUS interaction term was included in the models, and if non-significant, sex was only included as a covariate. RESULT: Participants (mean age: 70.9 ± 6.4 years, 55.3% female) included 87 classified as MBI+ and 213 as MBI-. Every one-unit increase in AUS score was associated with an estimated 11.11% higher MBI-C score (95% CI: 0.64-22.19, p = 0.04) (Table 2). The sex*AUS score interaction term was not significant (p = 0.33). The affective dysregulation domain was also significantly associated with a 14.10% higher MBI-C score for each one-unit increase in the AUS score (95% CI: 2.26-27.30, p = 0.02); the domains of decreased motivation (p = 0.26), impulse dyscontrol (p = 0.26), social inappropriateness (p = 0.61), and abnormal perception/thought content (p = 0.37) were not. CONCLUSION: More severe alcohol consumption is associated with greater MBI symptom severity, particularly in the affective dysregulation domain. These findings highlight the potential impact of alcohol consumption on neuropsychiatric symptoms, emphasizing the importance of addressing alcohol use in dementia prevention strategies. Future studies should investigate underlying biological mechanisms and explore longitudinal associations between alcohol consumption, MBI, and dementia risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→