MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116907583 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108459

Cognitive Groove Expands Life Space in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Community‐Based Rehabilitation Approach

2025· article· en· W7116907583 on OpenAlexaffabout
George Ioannidis, Αλεξάνδρα Παπαϊωάννου, Courtney Kennedy, J. Lee, Sharon Marr, Genevieve Hladysh, Ashlee M Azizudin, Caroline Marr, Patricia Hewston

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsJoseph Brant HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionGroove (engineering)Independence (probability theory)Space (punctuation)RehabilitationCognitive disabilities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Life space mobility - how far and how often someone moves through their environment - is a meaningful marker of physical function, cognitive health, and independence. In older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), life space often becomes restricted and can accelerate functional decline. This study evaluated the impact of Cognitive Groove, brought to you by GERAS DANCE, on life space mobility in older adults with and without MCI. METHOD: Cognitive Groove is a structured, community-based rehabilitation program designed for older adults with early cognitive and/or mobility challenges. The program was delivered across 12 YMCA sites in Southern Ontario, Canada. The program included in-person dance classes (twice weekly, 1 hour each) and at-home balance exercises (10 minutes daily) over 12-weeks. Life space mobility was assessed using the Life Space Assessment (LSA), cognitive function with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and physical function with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). MCI was defined as a baseline MoCA score of 18-25. Paired t-tests examined the changes from baseline to 12 weeks, and the chi-square test assessed changes in LSA frequency. Statistical significance was p ≤0.05. RESULT: A total of 106 older adults (age = 76.10(7.0) years; range 61-93) participated in Cognitive Groove. There were 61 older adults classified with MCI and 45 without MCI. Program adherence was high, with an average attendance of 75% (18/24 sessions). By the end of the program, older adults with MCI were moving farther and more often in their daily lives (p ≤0.05). Their life space became similar to those without MCI, whose movement stayed the same during the program (p >0.05). Notably, older adults with MCI reported more frequent travel outside their neighbourhood but within their town (Life Space Level 4, p <0.001). MoCA scores improved by 1.04 points in the MCI group, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 1.0, and both groups demonstrated significant improvements in SPPB scores (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that Cognitive Groove not only enhances physical performance, but also life space mobility, by fostering community re-engagement among older adults with MCI to support functional independence and active aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207