The Broken Cradle: Bone Marrow Stem Cell Niche Remodelling in Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic hyperglycemia in diabetes precipitates vascular damage and subsequent organ failure, yet the most critical defect is the inability to mount an adequate regenerative response. Numerous studies confirm that the reparative process, particularly angiogenesis, is profoundly defective in patients with diabetes. An increasingly vital area of investigation focuses on vasculogenesis: the de novo formation of blood vessels, involving specialized stem/progenitor cells. When these crucial repair cells and processes fail, complications in the target organ become inevitable and often irreversible. This review synthesizes our current understanding of how the complex diabetic milieu, marked by inflammation and metabolic stress, fundamentally corrupts the function, mobilization, and survival of these essential vascular regenerative populations. We highlight the known molecular mechanisms underlying this failure and, critically, examine emerging strategies to normalize these cellular abnormalities. Restoring robust vasculogenesis represents the next frontier in therapeutic development, holding the key to enhancing endogenous repair and successfully engineering new, functional vasculature to combat diabetic tissue damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".