MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116939813 · doi:10.18435/vamp29410

A marginal marine fauna from the upper Dinosaur Park Formation, Canada

2025· article· W7116939813 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Luke E. Nelson, Joshua Doyon, Alison E. Murray, Don Brinkman, Robert B. Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueVertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of NatureRoyal Tyrrell MuseumUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaunaTaxonStratigraphic unitCretaceousChondrichthyesAssemblage (archaeology)BiostratigraphyFish <Actinopterygii>Taxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the Late Cretaceous, the coastline of the epicontinental Western Interior Seaway in North America fluctuated in position, temporarily replacing some terrestrial ecosystems with shallow marine habitats.In southeastern Alberta, the uppermost portion of the Dinosaur Park Formation (Belly River Group, late Campanian) preserves one of these transgression–regression cycles in a marine wedge named here as theJohnson Unit. We report the stratigraphy of the unit based on nine stratigraphic sections over several kilometres of exposure. We describe a diverse assemblage of marine vertebrates from the Johnson Unit, represented by microfossils from a surface collecting survey. Our sample includes 1431 specimens, which we assign to 40 taxa. We identify eight new actinopterygians from the unit: Belonostomus longirostris, Amiidae indet.,Elopiformes indet., Horseshoeichthys sp., Enchodus gladiolus, Dercetis cf. D. magnificus, Acanthomorpha indet., and teleost indet. type O. The acanthomorph specimens, which include isolated spines and centra, represent the second marine Cretaceous acanthomorph reported from Alberta, and the highly ornamented spines are unlike any previously described. We revise several chondrichthyan identifications from previous authors and describe partial tooth plates from the chimaeriform Ischyodus bifurcatus for the first time in Canada. Compared to earlier samples from the same unit that were collected using screen-washing, our sample has ahigher diversity of actinopterygians and tetrapods. We identify several taxa to lower taxonomic levels using more complete specimens. These differences are attributed to our use of surface collection; this method allowed novel biogeographic and taxonomic insights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertebrate Anatomy Morphology PalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207