Ultrasound imaging using single-element biaxial beamforming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PurposeDynamic focusing of received ultrasound signals, or beamforming, is foundational for ultrasound imaging. Conventionally, it requires arrays of ultrasound sensors to estimate where sound came from using time-of-flight (TOF) measurements. We demonstrate passive beamforming with a single biaxial sensor and accurate passive acoustic mapping with two biaxial sensors using only direction of arrival (DOA) information.ApproachWe introduce two single-element biaxial beamforming algorithms and four biaxial image reconstruction algorithms for a two-element biaxial piezoceramic transducer array. Imaging of a hemispherical acoustic source is characterized in an acoustic scanning tank within the region −30.29 mm ≤x≤ 29.94 mm and 50.11 mm ≤z≤ 90.45 mm relative to the center of the array. Imaging performance is contrasted with delay, sum, and integrate (DSAI) and delay, multiply, sum, and integrate (DMSAI) algorithms.ResultsSingle-element biaxial beamforming can identify DOA with a median error (± interquartile range) of 0.36±0.63 deg and median full-width half-prominence of 7.3±8.6 deg. Using both array elements, DOA-only images demonstrate overall median localization error of 6.41 mm (lateral: 1.02 mm, axial: 5.85 mm, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR): 15.37) and DOA + TOF images demonstrate overall median error of 6.91 mm (lateral: 1.69 mm, axial: 6.11 mm, SNR: 18.37).ConclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, we provide the first demonstration of single-element beamforming using a single stationary piezoceramic and the first demonstration of passive ultrasound imaging without the use of TOF information. These results enable simpler, smaller, more cost-effective arrays for passive ultrasound imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it