MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116955967 · doi:10.1002/alz70862_109830

Advanced MRI biomarkers for efficient detection and monitoring of Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD) progression in clinical trials

2025· article· en· W7116955967 on OpenAlexaff
Simone P. Zehntner, Jean‐Philippe Coutu, Felix Carbonell, Alex Zijdenbos, Barry Bedell

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialCorticobasal degenerationImaging biomarkerBiomarkerMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder marked by misfolded tau protein accumulation, leading to neuronal degeneration. CBD shares clinical features with other Parkinsonian syndromes, complicating accurate diagnosis. MRI biomarkers, such as volumetric and diffusion MRI (dMRI) analyses, are essential for understanding disease progression and enhancing clinical trial efficiency. This study incorporates advanced imaging techniques to explore the progression of CBD and its differentiation from similar disorders. METHODS: MRI data from CBD, PSP, and healthy controls were sourced from the 4-Repeat Tauopathy Neuroimaging Initiative (4RTNI) and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI). Fully-automated image processing was performed using the PIANO™ software platform for gray matter density and regional volume assessments. dMRI metrics, such as radial diffusivity (RD) and free water (FW), were analyzed to track microstructural changes. Sample size calculations were conducted to estimate the number of participants required to detect therapeutic effects in a clinical trial. RESULTS: CBD subjects showed rapid brain atrophy with notable decreases in gray matter density. Figure 1 illustrates the surface projections of the statistically significant (FDR-corrected, q=0.05) gray matter changes over a 12-month period within the CBD population, particularly in the sensorimotor, parietal, and temporal cortices. Volumetric analysis revealed 2.5%-5% reductions in these regions, with subcortical atrophy noted in the thalamus and hippocampus. Sample size estimates indicated that 30-44 subjects per arm are required to detect a 60% reduction in atrophy. dMRI metrics show up to 5% change in regional mean diffusivity in white matter and cortical regions (sensory, motor, frontal, and parietal) over the same 12-month period. Sample size estimates for diffusion metrics as similar to those for the atrophy assessments. Compared to other tools, such as FreeSurfer, the PIANO™ platform significantly reduced sample size requirements while maintaining sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Advanced MRI methodologies, combining volumetric and diffusion-based analyses, enable precise tracking of CBD progression and differentiation from PSP. This approach minimizes sample size requirements, can potentially accelerate clinical trials, and facilitates early evaluation of disease-modifying therapies. The integration of robust imaging biomarkers into clinical trials is critical for improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic interventions for rare neurodegenerative diseases, like CBD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.066
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0660.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→