MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116962258 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108717

Understanding Cognitive Decline in Armenia’s Aging Population: A Nationwide Screening Study

2025· article· en· W7116962258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pateel A. Jivalagian, Arina Megerdichian, Joan K. Monin, Armen J. Moughamian, M. R. Movsisyan, Abraham Hambardzumian, Jane Mahakian

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthCognitive declineChristian ministryEpidemiologyCognitionCognitive impairmentHealthy aging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Amid developing health infrastructure, the Republic of Armenia's older adult population faces increasing concerns for cognitive impairment (CI) and subsequent dementia. The landlocked, post-Soviet country presents a unique opportunity to study a population that has been genetically isolated with a history of stressors like generational trauma and a high burden of vascular disease. The objective of this study is to contextualize the biological and environmental risk factors associated with CI in the severely understudied Armenian population. METHOD: This is a population-based, secondary analysis. Early detection cognitive screenings were conducted across 8 provinces by Alzheimer's Care Armenia from 2022-2023. The sample consisted of 2,598 older adults (55 years and older). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was administered to assess CI. CI was dichotomized into no CI or any level of CI. Age was categorized into ten-year intervals. Health behaviors and conditions were self-reported. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to understand population-level trends. RESULT: CI was observed in 37.1% of total participants: aged 55-64 (35.1%), 65-74 years (41.2%), and 75+ (23.7%). Individuals aged 65-74 and 75+ had increasingly higher odds of CI [AOR=2.00(1.64, 2.43); 5.92(4.37, 8.07), respectively] compared to younger individuals aged 55-64. Males had higher odds of CI [AOR=1.36(1.04, 1.78)]. Urban residence served as a protective factor for developing CI [AOR=0.72(0.59, 0.88)]. Obese BMI level was also protective [AOR=0.70(0.55, 0.90)]. Hearing loss was significantly associated with CI [AOR=1.52(1.25, 1.86)]. These results were significant (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: CI presents an emerging problem in developing countries, like Armenia, and requires engagement with the Ministry of Health and local stakeholders to provide culturally tailored preventive care. Establishing a national brain health registry in Armenia is vital to guide research efforts, design tailored interventions, structure public health planning, and contribute to global brain health knowledge. Future research should explore the contribution of individual risk factors to CI in the Armenian population, such as a potential genetic predisposition to hearing loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→