MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116966659 · doi:10.5287/ora-8j0b5q1ky

Settler literature and the Booker Prize: transnational literatures and metropolitan reception, 1985-2000

2022· dissertation· en· W7116966659 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas McLean

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNew Zealand Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityReading (process)TransnationalismLiterary criticismCanadian literatureOrder (exchange)Postcolonialism (international relations)Close reading

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the influence of the Booker Prize on transnational literary circulation — specifically that of Anglophone settler novels from New Zealand, Australia and Canada. Drawing distinctions between the desires of local and international audiences in these countries, the thesis examines work that has been locally but not transnationally canonized. It compares this work in each case to texts from the same country which have circulated transnationally and been recognized by the Booker Prize. The three winners of the prize examined here (Keri Hulme, Peter Carey and Margaret Atwood) found international success according to distinguishing criteria that discouraged reading for settler commonalities in favour of giving information about a particular place or group whose uniqueness is emphasised. Meanwhile, texts which remained locally circulated (by John Mulgan, Gerald Murnane, Leonard Cohen and Sheila Watson) are more productively read for commonalities. In the first chapter, the Māori Keri Hulme’s Booker winner The Bone People is read to show how features common to a literary tradition shared with the Pākehā John Mulgan’s Man Alone, and theorised across settler contexts, are read as markers of indigeneity because of prize culture. In the second chapter, Peter Carey (primarily in his True History of the Kelly Gang ) is read as dealing with cultural cringe by emphasising Australian quiddity and uniqueness, as well as by presenting (Irish) Australians as colonised rather than colonisers. The less well-known Gerald Murnane, especially in The Plains, avoids this by emphasising individual subjectivity over group identity, but the individual subjectivities he presents have been shaped by a settler colonial context. The third chapter examines how the state funding of literary production in Canada has created a bifurcated model where certain texts — Margaret Atwood’s earlier work, Leonard Cohen’s Beautiful Losers and Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook — respond closely to the concerns of different groups within and shaped by a settler state, especially when read hermeneutically. Meanwhile literature for export, such as Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin, instead responds to mimetic readings — such as in the context of the Booker — that establish a unitary and exotic Canadian identity for metropolitan readers. The conclusion briefly examines a final text, the South African Damon Galgut’s Booker-winning The Promise, to show the recurrence of patterns already identified throughout the thesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicNew Zealand Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207