MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116967607 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_102225

Investigating the Impact of Anxiety and Depression on Cognition Across Racial Groups in Older Adults

2025· article· en· W7116967607 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Doiron, Mahsa Dadar, Cassandra Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyCognitionDepression (economics)White (mutation)Racial differencesNegroidRacial group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Older adults who experience anxiety or depression are at a higher risk of progressing to Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to those who do not. Given that reports of anxiety and depression differ in both incidence and severity among racial groups, it is essential to examine how the relationship between neuropsychiatric experiences and cognitive decline may also differ across races. METHODS: A total of 10,112 participants, including 8182 White and 1390 Black older adults aged 55+ were included from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Data Set to investigate the relationship between anxiety and cognition as well as depression and cognition. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) measured anxiety and depression, respectively. Global cognition and cognitive functioning were quantified using scores from the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) as well as clinical judgement following neuropsychological evaluation. Linear regressions examined the interaction of race with anxiety and depression on cognition. Analyses also controlled for age, sex, years of study, and diagnosis. RESULTS: Main effects of anxiety and depression were associated with decreased global cognition scores (p < .001). The effect of anxiety on global cognition scores increased as a function of severity in both White and Black older adults (p < .001). Clinical judgments of cognitive functioning were significantly worse for people with anxiety across both races, but Blacks with anxiety exhibited worse scores across both measures of cognition compared to Whites (p < .001; Figure 1). The effect of depression on global cognition did not differ by race. However, higher rates of depression were associated with significantly worse clinical judgments of cognitive functioning in White compared to Black older adults (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Depression and anxiety are correlated with changes in cognition among both Black and White older adults. The experience of anxiety may have a greater impact on cognitive decline in Black than White adults. White adults with depression appear to exhibit worse cognitive status (as deemed by a clinician) compared to Black adults. These findings suggest differences in how depression and anxiety impact cognitive aging in different racial populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→