MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116983441 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006995

Platelet Transfusion Thresholds for Children Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Hemostatic Transfusions in Children (ECSTATIC) Feasibility Clinical Trial

2025· article· en· W7116983441 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne E. Nellis, Bradley J. Barney, Garrett Coles, Jill M. Cholette, Tarif A. Choudhury, Jamie Furlong-Dillard, Caroline Ozment, Jesse Bain, Robert A. Niebler, Madhuradhar Chegondi, Aditya Badheka, Ofer Schiller, Eran Shostak, Umesh Joashi, Matthew L. Paden, Jessica S. Alvey, Jennifer A. Muszynski, Philip C. Spinella, Marisa Tucci, Jacques Lacroix, Simon Stanworth, Erika R. OʼNeil, Uri Pollak, Timothy M. Bahr, S. Ram Kumar, Oliver Karam, subgroups of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) on behalf of BloodNet and PediECMO, SOLVD Investigators

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationPlateletClinical trialPlatelet transfusionRandomized controlled trialMembrane oxygenator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of randomizing children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to one of two prophylactic platelet transfusion thresholds. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Ten ECMO centers (nine in United States, one in Israel). PATIENTS: Critically ill children (0 to younger than 18 yr), supported on ECMO, with no or minimal bleeding within 24 hours of cannulation. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomized to a higher platelet threshold (transfused when platelet count < 90 × 10 9 /L) or a lower platelet threshold (transfused when platelet count < 50 × 10 9 /L). Primary feasibility outcome was pre-transfusion platelet count to test for a difference between strategies. Primary safety outcome was progression to severe bleeding, severe clotting, and/or all-cause mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 159 patients screened for eligibility, 77% (123/159) met eligibility criteria. Sixty-five percent (80/123) of caregivers were approached for consent. Consent was obtained in 63% (50/80). Enrolled children had a median age of 0.2 years (interquartile range 0.0; 1.7) and 88% (44/50) were supported by veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO. The model-adjusted mean difference in pre-transfusion platelet count between the groups was 32 × 10 9 /L ( p < 0.001). Compliance with assigned transfusion threshold was 99.2%. Eleven (22%) children experienced the primary safety outcome. Progression to severe bleeding occurred in 14% (7/50) of patients, whereas progression to severe clotting was observed in 4% (2/50). CONCLUSIONS: Non-bleeding children on ECMO can be screened, enrolled and randomized to different platelet transfusion strategies within 24 hours of cannulation. Compliance with the protocol was excellent with significant separation in pre-transfusion platelet counts between the arms. Severe bleeding and severe clotting occurred at similar rates in both thresholds. A larger, definitive trial is feasible and needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207