The Kochi metrorail project: transforming the identity of the passenger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While transport infrastructures have received scholarly attention as markers of aspiration and world-classness, their role in reordering the urban space has received scant attention. Transport spaces are important intermediary places, acting as potent venues for production and day-to-day consumption of urbanity. The sensorially intense atmospheres afforded by transport infrastructures present numerous opportunities for the intermingling of mobile bodies while challenging the status quo. Through a combination of design decisions and regulatory interventions, planners shape the production of atmospheres orienting transit users to a redefined, rarefied public ethic. Attending to the growing interest in public transport as a contentious public space, we deploy ethnographic tools of participant observation, conversations and interviews to interrogate the Kochi metrorail project in India while analysing the material and nonmaterial aspects of the system. Through an analysis of spatial practices in metrorail spaces, viewed through the lens of infrastructural citizenship and reinforced by project imagery and messaging, we chart the reconfiguration of the model passenger within the broader framework of metrorail exceptionalism. We argue that fostering citizenship and sustainability using public transport entails minimizing access barriers, embedding metrorail within urban socio-political contexts, and enabling the continuity of informal street practices across metrorail spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".