MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117114730 · doi:10.1002/alz70855_103467

The Influence of Variation in Hexanucleotide Repeat Number in the 5’ Untranslated Region of Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 7A1 on the Development of Cognitive Impairment

2025· article· en· W7117114730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph Pleen, Katelyn Cunningham, Ryan Goodson, Graham Blackwood, Heather M Wilkins, Russell H. Swerdlow

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein subunitGene isoformCognitionGenetic variationAssociation (psychology)Cytochrome c oxidaseCognitive impairmentEnzymeVariation (astronomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline is a feature seen with aging and is accelerated in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Mitochondrial dysfunction is also a feature of both aging and AD. A previous study identified a common hexanucleotide (AGCCCC) variant in the 5' untranslated (5' UTR) region of the Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 7A1 (COX7A1) gene through Sanger sequencing in a region of the genome not amenable to short read sequencing. The 5' UTR is upstream of the promoter and is known to impact translational regulation in vitro. In order to assess if this variation has an impact on cognition in vivo in humans, a cross-section of older individuals at risk for decline was sequenced. METHOD: Nuclear DNA samples were obtained from a cross-sectional cohort (N = 296) of individuals aged 65-85 from the National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (NCRAD). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed on the 5' UTR of COX7A1. Sanger sequencing was performed on a subset of samples to confirm variant length. Fragment analysis was performed on all samples and analyzed in GeneMapper to categorize the number of UTR repeats on each chromosome. Cognitive (MoCA z-score) and demographic (sex, age, education, and APOE status) data were obtained from corresponding participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. APOE e2 carriers were excluded from analysis. The dependent variable was the Montreal Cognitive Assessment z-score (MoCA z-score) and independent variables were APOE status (APOE e4 carrier vs non-carrier) and dichotomized COX7A1 UTR hexanucleotide repeat number (high repeat number and low repeat number). RESULT: Both APOE carrier status and COX7A1 UTR hexanucleotide repeat number were found to result in a statistically significant difference in MoCA z-score. CONCLUSION: In a small cross-sectional cohort (N = 296) aged 65-85 increased hexanucleotide repeat number in the 5' UTR of COX7A1 appears to negatively impact global cognition (MoCA z-score). Larger, prospective follow-up studies paired with neurodegenerative biomarkers will need to be performed to assess if this association is secondary to aging, AD neuropathological change, or other associated pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→