A Proportional Hazards Mixture Cure Model for Subgroup Analysis: Inferential Method and an Application to Colon Cancer Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When determining subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects in cancer clinical trials, the threshold of a variable that defines subgroups is often pre-determined by physicians based on their experience, and the optimality of the threshold is not well studied, particularly when the mixture cure rate model is considered. We propose a mixture cure model that allows optimal subgroups to be estimated for both the time to event for uncured subjects and the cure status. We develop a smoothed maximum likelihood method for the estimation of model parameters. An extensive simulation study shows that the proposed smoothed maximum likelihood method provides accurate estimates. Finally, the proposed mixture cure model is applied to a colon cancer study to evaluate the potential differences in the treatment effect of levamisole plus fluorouracil therapy versus levamisole alone therapy between younger and older patients. The model suggests that the difference in the treatment effect on the time to cancer recurrence for uncured patients is significant between patients younger than 67 and patients older than 67, and the younger patient group benefits more from the combined therapy than the older patient group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.090 | 0.178 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".