MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117123505 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf451

High indigestible dietary protein impairs growth and health status of nursery pigs with <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium more than with enterotoxigenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> F4 challenge

2025· article· en· W7117123505 on OpenAlexafffund
Taiwo J. Erinle, Marllon J K de Oliveira, John K Htoo, S Maria Mendoza, Jenny‐Lee Thomassin, Daniel A Columbus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsGenome PrairieUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersOntario Pork
KeywordsFecesEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliDiarrheaImmune systemInoculationSalmonellaDietary proteinIncidence (geometry)Weight gain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indigestible dietary protein content is an emerging dietary concept that is thought to be related to adverse intestinal health outcomes and increased incidence of pathogen-related diarrhea in pigs. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of IDP on growth performance, immune status, and fecal consistency score (FCS) of nursery pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 (ETEC) or Salmonella Typhimurium (ST). Thirty-two mixed-sex nursery pigs with an average initial body weight of 7.26 ± 0.40 kg were individually housed and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments for 14 d in a completely randomized design (n = 8 pigs/treatment). Corn-soybean-based diets were formulated to contain similar dietary protein (DP) content (21%) but differed in IDP content [low IDP, 2.74% (LIDP) or high IDP, 4.2% (HIDP)]. After a 7-d pre-inoculation period, all the pigs were orally inoculated with either 1.36 × 106 CFU·mL-1 ETEC or 1.14 × 1010 CFU·mL-1 ST (n = 16 pigs/challenge). Growth performance, rectal temperature, FCS, and blood inflammatory biomarkers were measured pre- and post-inoculation. There was no dietary effect on any measures pre-inoculation. Inoculation with ETEC or ST increased rectal temperature, FCS, blood inflammatory cytokines, acute-phase protein, and redox biomarkers (P < 0.05). Unlike in ETEC-inoculated pigs (P > 0.05), HIDP decreased average daily feed intake and average daily gain (P < 0.05) and tended to decrease gain: feed (P < 0.10) compared to LIDP in ST-inoculated pigs. Low IDP reduced FCS (P < 0.05) and tended to reduce ileal and cecal ammonia-nitrogen concentrations (P < 0.10) in ST-pigs compared to HIDP but not in ETEC-inoculated pigs. Regardless of enteric pathogen, HIDP stimulated immune response with higher serum interleukin-6 and plasma haptoglobin compared to LIDP (P < 0.05). In ST-inoculated pigs, HIDP further increased serum albumin, tumor necrotic factor-alpha, and diamine oxidase, pathogen translocation to mesenteric lymph node, while reducing plasma reduced glutathione (GSH) and GSH: oxidized glutathione (P < 0.05). Increasing IDP content results in negative outcomes on performance, fecal score, and inflammation in ST-inoculated pigs, with milder outcomes under ETEC challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207