MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117129544 · doi:10.1002/alz70855_103257

Elucidating the Interaction Dynamics Between a Novel Terpolymer and Aβ42: Unlocking Therapeutic Potential for Alzheimer's Disease

2025· article· en· W7117129544 on OpenAlexaff
Sako Mirzaie, Lily Yi Li, Chunsheng He, Jeffrey T. Henderson, P. E. Fraser, Xiao Yu Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanotoxicologyDiseaseOligomerNanomedicineProtein–protein interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is closely associated with the aggregation of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) peptides, particularly Aβ42. Toxic oligomeric forms of Aβ42 are implicated in synaptic dysfunction and cognitive decline, making them a key target for therapeutic interventions 1 . This study explores the interactions between a novel biodegradable terpolymer we developed for delivering imaging and therapeutic agents to the AD brain 2,3 and Aβ42 to evaluate its therapeutic potential. Method The biding affinity between Aβ42 and the terpolymer was evaluated using biolayer interferometry (BLI). Replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) 4 simulation was performed to analyze conformational changes in Aβ42 upon binding to the terpolymer. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal microscopy were employed to monitor time course of structural transitions, aggregation patterns, and cellular interactions. SH‐SY5Y cells were used to assess the effect of the terpolymer on attenuating Aβ42‐induced cytotoxicity. Result REMD simulations revealed rapid conformational transitions in Aβ42 upon terpolymer binding, shifting from random coil and α‐helical structures to stabilized β‐sheet‐rich states. CD spectroscopy demonstrated accelerated secondary structure transitions, corroborating the simulation findings. TEM showed that the terpolymer disrupted conventional Aβ42 aggregation patterns, resulting in smaller, irregular aggregates rather than typical long fibrils. Cellular assays indicated that the terpolymer significantly reduced Aβ42‐induced cytotoxicity, improving cell viability in the terpolymer treated groups. Confocal microscopy revealed cellular uptake of Aβ42‐terpolymer complexes, reducing extracellular toxicity and harmful interactions with cellular membranes. Conclusion This study highlights the capability of the terpolymer in modulating Aβ42 aggregation dynamics, mitigating toxic oligomer formation and alleviating its neurotoxic effects. These findings present a promising approach for developing polymer‐based therapies targeting Alzheimer's disease, offering a novel pathway to combat neurodegeneration. References Okumura, H., J Phys Chem B 2023, 127 (51), 10931‐10940. Park E, et al. Advanced Science. 2023, 10(12):2207238. Li, L.Y.; Park, E. et al. Nanotoxicology 2024 , 1‐20. Li, L.Y.; Park, E. et al. Nanotoxicology 2024, 1‐20.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→