MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117133603 · doi:10.1002/alz70855_105188

Locomotor and anxiety symptoms in the late‐onset Alzheimer's disease LOAD2 mouse model with normal age‐related cognitive decline

2025· article· en· W7117133603 on OpenAlexaff
Shinwon Kang, Ashish Kadia, Junhui Wang, Aram Abbasian, John Georgiou, Graham L Collingridge

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive declineDiseaseCognitionAnxietyAffect (linguistics)Exploratory research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), the most common form of dementia, arises from complex genetic and environmental interactions. Preclinical models that simulate the slow progression and long prodromal phase of LOAD are critical for identifying early therapeutic targets. The LOAD2 mouse model, developed on the C57BL/6J (B6J) genetic background, integrates key LOAD genetic risk factors: the APOE4 allele, the Trem2 R47H variant, and humanized App mutations within the amyloid-beta (Aβ) sequence. This study aimed to phenotype LOAD2 mouse behaviours, during ageing. METHOD: Behavioural assays were conducted on LOAD2 (JAX strain #030670) and B6J control mice at 18 and 24 months. Both male and female mice were assessed for locomotor activity (open field test), anxiety-like behaviour (elevated plus maze), spatial working memory (Y-maze), recognition memory (novel object recognition, novel location discrimination), and contextual memory (fear conditioning). RESULT: At 18 months, LOAD2 mice exhibited significantly reduced locomotor activity compared to B6J controls (p <0.01). However, at 24 months, this difference diminished as B6J mice displayed an age-related decline in exploration time. Anxiety-like behaviour was elevated in 18-month-old LOAD2 mice (p <0.05), but the difference was no longer evident at 24 months due to increased anxiety levels in aged B6J mice. Spatial working memory, assessed through the Y-maze task, remained unchanged in LOAD2 mice compared to B6J. Both groups showed impaired novel object and location recognition at 18 and 24 months, suggesting overall age-related cognitive decline. In contextual fear-conditioning, LOAD2 mice exhibited higher freezing levels responses compared to B6J controls at 18 months (p <0.01). Fear memory was intact since both groups recognized the testing context 24 h later. Subsequently, when the auditory cue was presented in a novel context, both groups showed increased freezing. At 24 months both groups showed comparable performance in contextual and auditory fear memory tests. CONCLUSION: LOAD2 mice exhibit early locomotor deficits and heightened anxiety, which are commonly associated with AD. However, both models show similar age-related declines in exploratory behaviour and recognition memory. Thus, more extensive testing and/or environmental challenges will be needed to detect overt cognitive deficits in LOAD2 mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→