MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117148141 · doi:10.32799/ijih.v21i1.45607

Ceremony, Respect, and Understanding: Storytelling as Method for Indigenous Patient Experience Measurement to Inform Culturally Safe Care

2025· article· W7117148141 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Hannah Doyle, Andreas Pilarinos, Elder Roberta Price, Elder Dennis Joseph, Elder Doris Fox, Elder Ruth Alfred, Sandra Fox, Mark Matthew, Brittany Bingham

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Indigenous Health · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's HealthProvidence Health CareWomen's Health Research InstituteAssembly of First NationsVancouver Coastal HealthSquamish NationVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousStorytellingThematic analysisHealth careCultural safetyNarrativeTraditional knowledgeCulturally appropriate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, it is essential that Indigenous-specific patient healthcare experience metrics are developed, to ensure that the distinct experiences of Indigenous Peoples in healthcare are captured appropriately. In this study, we sought to understand Indigenous Elders' perspectives on storytelling as a way to measure and respond to Indigenous patients’ healthcare experiences. This study is led by a team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, committed to using culturally safe approaches throughout all stages of research. Four individual interviews were conducted with Indigenous Elders who serve patients in the healthcare system in Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), Canada, and thematic and narrative analyses were used to identify themes pertaining to the use of storytelling in the Elders’ work, and as an approach to measuring Indigenous patients’ experiences. Four BC First Nations Elders participated in one-on-one in-depth interviews between March and August 2023. Elders shared that an important element of storytelling is the ability to centre positive conversation to help with a patients’ healing journey. Storytelling, which represents a traditional practice of knowledge translation for many First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities, was found to connect Indigenous Peoples to cultural teachings and supports, which allowed for the building and strengthening of relationships between patients, families, and healthcare providers. Findings illustrate that storytelling is an important and effective strategy for measuring and responding to Indigenous patients’ healthcare experiences. Study results support the use of storytelling as a method for measuring Indigenous patients’ healthcare experiences, and future research should focus on understanding community perspectives and logistics of implementing a storytelling-based, Indigenous-specific patient experience measurement tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Indigenous HealthSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207