Performance and hematological profile of broiler chickens administered by ethanol extract of African leaves ( <i>Vernonia amygdalina</i> )
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to determine the effect of using african leaf herbal feed ingredients (Vernonia amygdalina) as a feed additive on the performance and hematology profile of broiler chickens. A total of 100 DOC (MB90) broilers were randomly assigned to 20 cage units consisting of 4 treatments and 5 replications. In each treatment, African leaf extract was given in drinking water at different doses (A0 = control; A1 = 250 mg/L; A2 = 500 mg/L; and A3 = 750 mg/L). The feed used in this research is commercial feed for the DOC period up to the harvest period. Body weight and feed consumption are calculated weekly during the study (4 weeks). All data are recorded to determine the performance of broiler chickens, while sample blood collection for hematology tests is performed at the end study. Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA. Differences between treatments were stated if P<0.05. The results showed that giving African leaf extract as a feed additive had no effect (P>0.05) on the performance and hematology profile of broiler chickens. From this research, it was concluded that African leaf extract did not have a negative effect on the performance and profile of broiler chicken hematology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it