MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117163840 · doi:10.2196/74933

Febrile Seizures in an App-Based Children’s Fever Registry: Mixed Methods Study

2025· article· en· W7117163840 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Martin, Ricarda Möhler, Christopher B. Germann, Moritz Gwiasda, Silke Schwarz, Jenetzky Ekkehart

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermal Regulation in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsEpilepsyDiseaseMEDLINEIncidence (geometry)Etiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Febrile seizures, although typically benign, can cause significant emotional distress for parents. Their diverse etiological risk factors underscore the need for further research. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a cost-effective and timely method for real-time data collection. The FeverApp, an EMA-based registry for fever management, enables parents to document febrile seizures as they occur. OBJECTIVE: This study systematically investigates febrile seizure records from the FeverApp registry to assess their characteristics and explore the clinical implications of the findings. By providing real-world data on seizure management, this research demonstrates the potential of app-based EMA in pediatric care. Additionally, it offers insights for targeted interventions and improved febrile seizure management. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach. A descriptive qualitative analysis of parental descriptions of 226 seizures belonging to 161 children was conducted. Additionally, a comparative quantitative analysis of group differences was assessed through matched-pair sampling, comparing 114 children. Statistical methods were tailored to the nature of the respective variables, which included prevalence, age, gender, health and febrile history, fever management, temperature, well-being, and parental confidence. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses provided detailed descriptions of seizure symptoms, seizure duration, and seizure management practices. Additionally, the data revealed a high rate of emergency consultations related to febrile seizures. However, there was underreporting of febrile seizures within the FeverApp, with a reported incidence of only 0.4% among febrile children. In a matched sample controlled for gender and age, significant differences were observed between febrile children with and those without febrile seizures in several parameters, including maximum recorded temperature (P<.001), prevalence of chronic diseases (P=.004), parental confidence (P=.01), and frequency of emergency consultations (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers valuable insights into the characteristics, temporal dynamics, management strategies, and parental responses to febrile seizures in children. Despite the limitation of potential underreporting in an EMA-based registry, the findings highlight the critical importance of parental education and support in managing febrile seizures. Enhancing these areas has the potential to reduce unnecessary medical consultations and improve the overall care of affected children. Furthermore, integrating improvements in the FeverApp's education and documentation system regarding febrile seizures could facilitate better management and support future research efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Pediatrics and ParentingSame topicThermal Regulation in MedicineFrench-language works237,207