MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117166043 · doi:10.14740/jnr1054

Prognostic Value of Stroke Severity Measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score for Post-Stroke Neuropsychiatric Outcomes in a Hispanic Population

2025· article· en· W7117166043 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria de los Angeles Alvarez, Xavier Andres Grandes, Lina Karitza Zambrano, Ana Sofia Cantos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Depression (economics)Odds ratioConfidence intervalAnxietyHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleLogistic regressionPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality. Neuropsychiatric complications are frequent, and stroke severity measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) may help identify patients at risk for adverse neuropsychiatric outcomes. The objective was to analyze whether stroke severity measured by the NIHSS score is associated with the development of neuropsychiatric complications after stroke in a Hispanic population. Methods: This observational, analytical, retrospective study included 170 adults with CT-confirmed stroke treated in 2024 at a tertiary hospital in Guayaquil. Stroke severity (NIHSS), clinical variables, and neuropsychiatric outcomes were analyzed using chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U, and multivariable logistic regression, adhering to STROBE and ethical standards (SPSS version 27.0). Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), considering P < 0.05 and including only models with an events-per-variable (EPV) ratio ≥ 6. Results: A total of 170 adults (mean age 61.32 ± 14.62 years) were studied; 63.5% were male. Ischemic strokes comprised 56.5% and hemorrhagic 43.5%. Median NIHSS at admission was 7 (interquartile range (IQR) 4 - 13); categories: no deficit 6.5%, mild 25.9%, moderate 48.8%, moderate-severe 8.2%, severe 10.6%. Overall, 42.4% (n = 72) developed neuropsychiatric manifestation: cognitive impairment and sleep disturbances each occurred in 22.4%, behavioral disorders in 20.0%, depression in 15.30%, anxiety in 8.20%, and psychosis in 4.70%. Chi-square testing showed significant associations for moderate strokes with sleep disturbances (63.2%, P = 0.024), cognitive impairment (68.4%, P = 0.029), and behavioral disorders (76.5%, P = 0.003). Mann-Whitney comparisons indicated higher median NIHSS in patients with depression (12 vs. 7, P = 0.014), sleep disturbances (8 vs. 6, P = 0.025), and behavioral disorders (12 vs. 6, P = 0.002). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that younger age (Exp(B) = 0.957, P = 0.046), female sex (Exp(B) = 9.801, P < 0.001), and higher NIHSS scores (Exp(B) = 1.101, P = 0.010) independently predicted depression. Higher NIHSS scores also predicted sleep disturbances (Exp(B) = 1.072, P = 0.047) and behavioral disorders (Exp(B) = 1.071, P = 0.036), with female sex acting as a protective factor for behavioral disorders (Exp(B) = 0.227, P = 0.012). Cognitive impairment was associated with shorter time to onset (Exp(B) = 0.997, P = 0.037). Conclusion: The NIHSS scale proved to be a useful tool not only for measuring the initial severity of stroke, but also for identifying the risk of developing neuropsychiatric complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207