MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117166140 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_101515

Associations between neurodegenerative and acute injury biomarkers and post‐stroke cognitive impairment – the Nor‐COAST study

2025· article· en· W7117166140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne‐Brita Knapskog, Guglielmo Di Molfetta, Heidi Vihovde Sandvig, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Stina Vihovde Aam, Ingvild Vihovde Saltvedt, Nicholas W. Ashton

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute strokeCognitive impairmentDiseaseCognitionStroke (engine)Biomarker

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Patients with vascular risk factors have a higher incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and AD patients have an increased risk of experiencing stroke. About half of all stroke survivors experience post‐stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). Stroke triggers numerous inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes both in the acute and chronic phases. The aims of this study were to investigate longitudinal plasma biomarker data in a stroke population and whether high levels of neurodegenerative and acute injury biomarkers at baseline could predict PSCI. Method In this Nor‐COAST substudy, we included 547 stroke patients (Age [mean = 73± 12], 56 % males, 89 % ischemic strokes, 11 % haemorrhagic strokes). Brain‐derived tau (BD‐tau), phosphorylated tau 181 ( p ‐tau 181 ), total tau (t‐tau), amyloid β40 (Aβ 40 ), Aβ 42 , glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations were measured on the Simoa platform in plasma samples collected at inclusion, and after 3, 18 and 36 months. We explored the biomarkers’ associations with cognitive decline as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale up to 36 months post‐stroke. Result Within the first three months BD‐tau, t‐tau, and GFAP concentrations declined by 43%, 20% and 76% respectively, whereas NfL levels continued to decrease up to 18 months (59%). p ‐tau 181 increased gradually by 24 % from acute phase to 36 months. Aβ 42 remained unchanged. Higher acute phase concentrations of BD‐tau, NfL and p ‐tau 181 predicted lover MoCA score up to 36 months post‐stroke in patients with ischemic stroke ( p value < 0.05). However, including clinical parameters attenuated the associations. These associations were not found in the patients with haemorrhagic stroke. Conclusion Concentrations of plasma BD‐tau, NfL, GFAP, and t‐tau were increased in the acute phase of stroke, but no significant change was seen for Aβ 42 . BD‐tau, t‐tau and GFAP concentrations decreased to stable levels within 3 months of event, NfL stabilized within 18 months, whereas p ‐tau181 showed an increase. Higher concentrations of BD‐tau, NfL, and p ‐tau 181 were associated with worse cognitive outcome up to 36 months post‐stroke. These results indicate that stroke trigger a continuing neurodegenerative process, as demonstrated by gradually increasing concentrations of p ‐tau 181 leading to PSCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→