MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117234131 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_101673

Sex & menopause related differences in vascular health and rsFMRI connectivity in middle‐aged adults

2025· article· en· W7117234131 on OpenAlexaff
Julia Kearley, Bratislav Misic, Maria Natasha Rajah, Charana Rajagopal, Sophia LoParco

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenopausePostmenopausal womenBody mass indexEpidemiologyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Menopause is associated with hormonal changes that can impact vascular health and brain function, including resting‐state functional connectivity (rsFC). Declines in estrogen have been linked to memory disruptions and altered connectivity in networks supporting cognition 1 . Vascular risk (VR) factors, such as cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and BMI, may exacerbate these effects, particularly in postmenopausal females 2,3 . Understanding how menopause and VR influence rsFC is crucial for identifying mechanisms underlying memory decline and informing strategies to support cognitive health in aging females. Method We conducted two complementary analyses to (1) investigate how VR factors influence rsFC between males vs. females and (2) examine whether menopause status in middle‐aged females influences these associations. Rs‐fMRI data was collected from 42 premenopausal, 41 postmenopausal and 39 male participants. FC matrices were computed using 200 cortical ROIs 4 and 4 hippocampal ROIs 5 . VR was assessed using measures of BMI, exercise, education, age, cholesterol, and systolic BP. VR factors were entered as behavioral vectors in two‐group B‐PLS analyses (Analysis #1: males vs. females; Analysis #2: premenopausal vs. postmenopausal females) to identify group‐specific rsFC patterns. Result Analysis 1 identified both similarities and differences in the effect of VR on rsFC in males and females. Both sexes exhibited increased FC between hippocampus (HC) and other cortical networks, and decreased FC between Dorsal and Ventral Attention networks (DAN, VAN) for individuals with higher cholesterol, who also exercised regularly. In males this pattern was also associated with BMI. In females this pattern of FC was also associated with higher BP, and older age. In addition, females uniquely showed increased FC between DAN and Control (CON) and Default Mode (DMN) networks, respectively, which was also related to increased cholesterol, BP, age and regular exercise. Analysis 2 indicated the effects observed in females in Analysis 1 were driven by postmenopausal females. Conclusion Sex and menopause status shape the relationship between VR and rsFC. Females appear more vulnerable to VR‐related rsFC changes, particularly postmenopausal females, where cholesterol, age, and BP affected rsFC involving the hippocampus, DMN, DAN, and Control networks. Interestingly, BMI was not associated with rsFC in females, but was in males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments→French-language works237,207→