Altai Scientific Expedition of the Kamensky Museum of Local Lore in 1924
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents data on the expeditionary research of the Kamensky Regional Museum of Local Lore (Altai Territory, Kamensky district, Kamen-na-Obi, Lenina str., 49) in 1923 and 1924, which materials formed the basis of the museum’s collection. The study analyzes the goals and objectives of the expeditions, their routes, logistical and financial aspects of their preparation. The composition of the participants, their responsibilities and scientific interests are highlighted. The article contains an overview of archival materials, including reports, correspondence, travel certificates and other documents related to the expeditions of 1923–1924. Special attention is paid to the Altai scientific expedition of 1924. The result of analysing the collections of various museums that hold the materials of expeditionary research conducted by the Kamensky Museum in the first half of the 1920s is presented. The information introduced into scientific circulation about the early stages of the formation of the museum collection of the Kamensky Museum of Local Lore indicates significant expeditionary research conducted by the staff of this institution in Western Siberia. The key role of the famous traveler, publicist and ethnographer of the first quarter of the 20th century M. A. Krukovsky in the formation of the museum and the organization of expeditionary research is emphasized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".