MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117236720 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2025.3648250

Stochastic Sparse Sampling: A Variable-Length Time Series Classification Framework for Seizure Onset Zone Localization

2025· article· en· W7117236720 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Mootoo, Alan A. Díaz-Montiel, Milad Lankarany, Hina Tabassum

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)ElectroencephalographyTime seriesSignal processingDistortion (music)Local field potentialEpilepsySeries (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variable-length time series classification (VTSC) problems are prevalent in healthcare applications, such as heart rate monitoring and electrophysiological recordings, where sequence length varies among patients and events. VTSC is challenging as finite-context models such as Transformers require padding, truncation, or interpolation, leading to distortion in the input data, higher computational costs, and overfitting, while infinite-context models including recurrent neural networks struggle with overcompression and unstable gradients over long sequences. In this paper, we develop a novel VTSC framework based on Stochastic Sparse Sampling (SSS) for seizure onset zone (SOZ) localization, a critical VTSC problem requiring identification of seizure-inducing brain regions from variable-length electrophysiological time series. The proposed framework sparsely samples time series windows to compute local predictions, which are then aggregated and calibrated to form a global prediction. SSS provides post-hoc insights into local signal characteristics related to the SOZ, by visualizing temporally averaged local predictions throughout the signal. We evaluate our method on the Epilepsy intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) Multicenter Dataset, a heterogeneous collection of iEEG recordings obtained from four independent medical centers. The proposed solution outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines across most medical centers, and superior performance on all out-of- distribution (OOD) unseen medical centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207