MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117238104 · doi:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2025.100649

Biventricular remodeling and function after Cone repair of Ebstein Anomaly: A review

2025· article· en· W7117238104 on OpenAlexaff
Mimi Deng, Alison J Howell, Osami Honjo, Mark K. Friedberg

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreloadVentricleAfterloadRegurgitation (circulation)Ventricular remodelingHeart failureEbstein's anomalyPulmonary hypertension

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Cone reconstruction is the prevailing repair strategy for Ebstein anomaly (EA), providing near-anatomical restoration of the tricuspid valve (TV) and reliable reduction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Most of the risk of Cone repair is seen in the early postoperative period from dehiscence, with very low rates of mortality and reintervention thereafter. By correcting TV dysfunction and abnormal right ventricle (RV) geometry, ventricular reverse remodeling has been demonstrated through decreased right atrial and atrialized RV size, along with improved antegrade pulmonary flow and consequent left ventricular filling. Early postoperative RV dysfunction is common due to increased afterload upon addressing TR, with suggestion of delayed recovery. Cone repair augments left ventricular preload and preserves left ventricular function. The contrasting effects of ventricular plication and superior repositioning of TV during the Cone repair has led to discrepant reports in the trajectory of RV remodeling, which is further confounded by the lack of standardization in imaging measurements and timing of surveillance. Consistency in imaging protocol and lengthening follow-up will hopefully provide a more robust understanding about the evolution of the postoperative RV. Improvement in functional status and aerobic capacity can also be appreciated post-Cone repair, particularly in highly symptomatic patients. Innovation to promote remodeling of the Ebsteinoid heart include stem cell therapy at the time of surgical repair, which has shown promise in phase I clinical trial. Lastly, the goal of biventricular repair through Cone reconstruction can be facilitated by Starnes palliation to stabilize critical presentations, a paradigm shift that is increasingly adopted. Graphical abstract. Cone repair of Ebstein anomaly is associated with biventricular remodeling. LV, left ventricle; NYHA, New York Heart Association; QoL, quality of life; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; TR, tricuspid regurgitation. • Biventricular remodeling occurs after Cone repair of Ebstein anomaly • Right atrial size decreases and left ventricle size increases post-repair • Change in right ventricular geometry is variable across studies • Early postoperative reduction of RV function later recovers • Standardization in timing and measurements of imaging surveillance is needed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart DiseaseSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207