MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117240547 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_100391

Serum placental growth factor as a biomarker of cerebrovascular changes in Alzheimer's disease

2025· article· en· W7117240547 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Dallaire‐Théroux, Rosalie Juliette Cottez, Olivier Potvin, Mahsa Dadar, Vincent Émond, Cyntia Tremblay, Frédéric Calon

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomarkerPlacental growth factorDiseaseRisk factorPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: While Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers are now widely used, those focusing on vascular etiologies remain underdeveloped. Among candidates, angiogenesis markers appear particularly promising. Placental growth factor (PlGF) plays a key role in tissue vascularization and regulation of vascular permeability, in addition to being reactive to cerebral ischemia. Here, we aimed to establish the role of PIGF in AD by examining its association with selected MRI markers of cerebrovascular disease (CVD). METHOD: We measured serum concentrations of PIGF (U-PLEX Human PIGF Assay, Meso Scale Discovery) in elderly individuals with subjective cognitive impairment (n = 114), mild cognitive impairment (n = 86), early AD (n = 29) and controls (n = 55) from the CIMA-Q cohort. MRI CVD markers included regional white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volumes and microbleeds acquired through validated segmentation tools. PlGF levels were compared across groups using one-way ANOVA, while associations with age, sex, vascular risk factors, cognition, and AD biomarkers were analyzed using Pearson/Spearman tests. Linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and ApoE4 examined the link between PlGF and MRI CVD markers. RESULT: Serum PlGF was found to be higher in men than women (p = .02) and to increase with age (p = .003) but did not differ between clinical groups. Among vascular and metabolic parameters, PlGF levels correlated positively with waist size, weight and triglycerides levels (p <.005). There was also a trend between PlGF levels and diastolic, but not systolic, blood pressure (p = .05). Serum pTau217 was the only AD biomarker associated with PlGF (p <.05). We could not find any direct association between PlGF and cognition. PlGF levels correlated with total (r=0.19, p = .03) and deep cerebellar (r=0.18, p = .04) microbleeds, but not WMH. In regression models, the association between PlGF and microbleeds remain consistent in APOE4 carriers (b=2.1, p = .04) and in men (b=1.8, p = .03) only. CONCLUSION: Serum PlGF is a promising biomarker of CVD, especially cerebral microbleeds, in AD. Our results suggest that its role may specifically apply to certain subpopulations such as APOE4 carriers. In the era of anti-amyloid therapies, understanding mechanisms linking PlGF to CVD is of utmost importance to evaluate its potential for safety and monitoring purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207