MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117241039 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_103725

Sex‐specific effects of neuropsychiatric symptoms on amyloid and tau pathology and white matter hyperintensity volume in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

2025· article· en· W7117241039 on OpenAlexaff
Aurelie Garrone, Yara Yakoub, Alfonso Fajardo, Ting Qiu, Amelie Metz, Mahsa Dadar, Valentin Ourry, Sylvia Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseHyperintensityTau pathologyAmyloid (mycology)White matterMagnetic resonance imagingAmyloid β

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and may constitute both risk factors and early signs of the disease. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that NPS are associated with increased Aβ and tau burden in preclinical AD populations. The amygdala, a brain region involved in emotion modulation and processing, is among the most vulnerable regions to exhibit early tau deposition. Further, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, another neurological correlate of AD, has been linked to worsening NPS, especially in frontotemporal regions. Interestingly, sex may also affect the incidence and prevalence of NPS in AD, with females being at higher risk than males. We assessed the associations between NPS and 1) Aβ, 2) amygdala tau and 3) frontal WMH burden in cognitively unimpaired older adults. Given that females reportedly exhibit greater NPS prevalence and severity, we hypothesized that these associations would be stronger in females; at higher levels of NPS, females should therefore exhibit greater pathology. METHOD: F-Flortaucipir) PET-scans. We conducted linear regressions using sex as an interaction term to assess the effect of NPS (apathy, anxiety, depression, stress, perseverative thinking and neuroticism) on global Aβ-PET standard uptake values ratio (SUVr), tau-PET SUVr in the amygdala, and WMH volume in the frontal lobe. These associations were also examined separately in males and females. All models were corrected for age, years of education, APOE4 carrier status and cardiovascular risk. RESULT: Despite females exhibiting greater NPS, several associations, particularly with WMH volume, were found in males, but not in females. Stress and depression were also associated with amyloid and amygdala tau deposition in males, while perseverative thinking was associated with amygdala tau deposition in females. CONCLUSION: We found associations between NPS and both MRI and PET markers of AD in cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk of AD. Some of these associations were stronger in males, despite females being at increased risk of AD and known to exhibit a higher prevalence of NPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→