MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117246510 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_105941

Long COVID and Low Education: Neuropsychological Findings from the Brazilian NeuroCovid Cohort

2025· article· en· W7117246510 on OpenAlexaff
Joana Emilia Senger, Luiza Santos Machado, Maiele Dornelles Silveira, João Pedro Ferrari‐Souza, Marco De Bastiani, Guilherme Povala, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Guilherme Arantes Mello, João Pedro Uglione da Ros, Arthur Viana Jotz, Matheus Fakhri Kadan, Graciane Radaelli, Tharick A. Pascoal, Cristina Sebastião Matushita, Ricardo Benardi Soder, Artur Francisco Schumacher Schuh, Diogo O. Souza, Mychael V. Lourenco, Daniele de Paula Faria, Arthur Coutinho, Jaderson Costa da Costa, Débora Guerini de Souza, Eduardo R. Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionNeuropsychologyCohortCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Cognitive reservePsychological resilienceEducational attainmentCognitive decline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Long COVID is a chronic condition that persists for at least three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is characterized by a wide range of symptoms, including neurological manifestations. This study aimed to investigate the influence of long COVID on neuropsychological performance in adults with different educational levels, categorized into high and low education groups. METHOD: We included community-dwelling individuals from Porto Alegre, Brazil. Participants were divided into four groups based on education and long COVID status: Control-Low Education (CLE), Control-High Education (CHE), Long COVID-Low Education (LCOVID_LE), and Long COVID-High Education (LCOVID_HE). High education was defined as having more than 11 years of schooling. Neuropsychological assessments included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Trail Making Test (TMT-B), and the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-R). Group differences in neuropsychological performance were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Post hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted for significant main effects.a A Kruskal Wallis analysis was used for non-parametric tests. Statistical analyses were performed using R software, with a significance threshold set at p <0.05p<0.05. RESULT: A total of 122 individuals were included, with a mean age of 59.6 years (± 14.9), of whom 73.8% were female. Demographic details are shown in Figure 1. Participants in the CLE group scored significantly lower on the MMSE than the CHE group (p = 0.007). Similarly, the LCOVID_LE group scored significantly lower than the CHE group (p = 0.009). A significant result was found between MMSE and education (p = 0.003) in Kruskal Wallis analysis. However, no significant effects of long COVID were observed in other neuropsychological domains assessed. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted the significant interplay between educational attainment, which contributes to cognitive reserve, and the neurological manifestations of long COVID. Higher educational attainment may confer resilience against cognitive decline associated with long COVID. While long COVID was linked to lower global cognitive scores, no specific cognitive domain appeared particularly vulnerable. These findings underscore the importance of prioritizing support for vulnerable populations with low education to promote brain health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→