MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117252453 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_099558

Sex differences in the association between sleep duration and blood‐based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration: The Framingham Heart Study

2025· article· en· W7117252453 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa M. Young, Crystal Wiedner, Andrée‐Ann Baril, Christopher R. Frei, Antonio L Teixeira, Agustı́n Ruiz, Matthew P. Pase, Alexa S Beiser, Jayandra J. Himali, Sudha Seshadri

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)Association (psychology)DiseaseFramingham Heart StudyNeurodegenerationActigraphySleep deprivation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are associated with inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes, as well as greater Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. However, the relationship between sleep duration and blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) of neurodegeneration and AD pathology remains understudied, particularly across sexes. In a community-based cohort, we examined the cross-sectional associations between self-reported sleep duration and BBMs of neurodegeneration (t-tau, NfL), AD pathology (p-tau-181), and astrocyte activation (GFAP), and explored potential sex-specific effects. METHODS: Our sample included 2,254 participants (mean age 69.9±8.4 years, 44.9% male) from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring (exam 9) and Omni 1 (exam 4) cohorts who completed their visits between 2011-2014. Sleep duration was assessed by a technician-administered questionnaire. Plasma t-tau, p-tau-181, GFAP, and serum NfL were measured using Single Molecule Array (SIMOA) assays. All BBMs were log-transformed and standardized for analysis. Model 1 adjusted for age, sex-at-birth, and cohort; Model 2 additionally adjusted for sleep apnea, cardiovascular risk factors, depression (defined as Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥16 or antidepressant use), eGFR, APOE4, stroke, and all-cause-dementia. RESULTS: Table 1 depicts sample characteristics. Longer sleep duration was associated with higher t-tau levels across all models (Model 1: β±SE=0.05±0.02, p <0.001; Model 2: 0.03±0.02, p = 0.036) (Table 2). There were statistically significant sex interactions for t-tau (p = 0.019), NfL (p = 0.006), and GFAP (p = 0.007). In sex-stratified analyses (Table 3), we observed positive associations between longer sleep duration and higher biomarker levels (t-tau: 0.10±0.02, NfL: 0.11±0.02, GFAP: 0.010±0.02; all p <0.001) in males but not in females. No significant associations or interactions were observed for p-tau-181. CONCLUSION: Sex significantly modified associations between sleep duration and BBMs. Specifically, only males showed significant positive associations between longer sleep and elevated t-tau, NfL, and GFAP levels. Relative to females, males have heightened inflammatory responses to sleep disturbances, which may partially explain our sex-specific findings with BBMs of neuronal injury and astrogliosis. Although limited by cross-sectional design and self-reported sleep measures, the findings underscore the relevance of sex-specific analyses in sleep and neurodegeneration research. We will next explore non-linear associations as short and long sleep may relate to BBMs level differently. Future longitudinal studies with objective sleep measurements are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicSleep and related disorders→French-language works237,207→