Effect of different sources of selenium supplementation on immune function in pregnant and lactating ewes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selenium (Se) is an essential soil mineral that can be incorporated into animal feedstuffs. Because of a lack of soil Se in some regions, organic or inorganic supplementation strategies must be implemented to prevent deficiencies and promote optimal ovine health. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to assess how inorganic versus organic Se supplementation influenced ewe Se status and immune function during late gestation and postpartum. Dorset Rideau ewes (n = 110) were fed a Se deficient diet from gestation d 110 through postpartum d 49 and received one of four daily oral Se treatments diluted in 5 mL of sugar water: 0 mg Se, 0.3 mg inorganic Se, 0.3 mg organic Se, and 0.6 mg organic Se. Throughout the trial, the ewes received various immune challenges, including intramuscular immunizations with a novel antigen (ovalbumin; OVA) on trial d 0 and 10, an intradermal OVA challenge on d 20, and a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin challenge on trial d 49. RESULTS: The organic Se treatment groups had higher serum Se concentrations on most trial days compared to the 0.3 mg inorganic and control groups (P < 0.05). No significant treatment differences were found for the dermal hypersensitivity response to OVA, anti-OVA antibody response, glutathione peroxidase activity, cytokine response, cortisol response, or rectal temperature (P > 0.05). However, 4 h post-LPS injection, the serum albumin concentration was significantly lower in the 0.3 mg inorganic group compared to both organic Se groups, potentially indicating a higher degree of inflammation in the ewes supplemented with the inorganic Se. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that organic Se supplementation can promote a higher Se status in ewes over time, but Se supplementation during this study period did not affect tested immunological parameters. This lack of difference in immune responsiveness between groups may be due to an absence of true serum Se deficiencies in the Se-deficient group or the levels of Se supplementation being insufficient to significantly improve immunocompetence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".