MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117257690 · doi:10.19136/era.a12nv.4224

<b>Densidad poblacional y ocupación del lince rojo (<i>Lynx rufus </i>Schreber)<i> </i>en el matorral espinoso</b>

2025· article· es· W7117257690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Manuel Mata Balderas, Carlos Guadalupe Andrade Peña, Tania Isela Sarmiento Muñoz, Karen Alejandra Cavada Prado, Elizabeth Mata Balderas, Eduardo Treviño Garza, Eduardo Alanís Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

VenueEcosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupancyVegetation (pathology)Abundance (ecology)Population densityPopulationVegetation coverAridHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bobcat (Lynx Rufus Schreber, 1777) is a mesopredator distributed from southern Canada to southern Mexico. Its presence is an indicator of good ecosystem quality. Although it is considered the most abundant felid in Mexico, there are very few studies that evaluate its population dynamics in arid zones. Therefore, the objective was to determine the population density and occupancy probability of bobcats in fragments of Tamaulipan thornscrub. Population abundance and density were estimated using camera traps and the MARK-CAPTURE tool. The vegetation composition of landscape corridors was evaluated to estimate their relationship with the bobcat population. An occupancy model was elaborated to analyze the presence of the species in the area, using environmental and anthropogenic impact covariates. The average density resulted in 8 individuals 100 km-2, derived from the identification of 23 bobcats and an effective sampling area of 140.31 km2. Sites 17 and 18 had the highest vegetation cover and the highest number of records, as well as a female with cubs and with different prey. The occupancy probability was positively associated with areas of higher vegetation cover. It is concluded that the density values presented are associated with the fragmentation of the vegetation community, and that the variables with the greatest influence on the presence of bobcats are vegetation cover and diversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcosistemas y Recursos AgropecuariosSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207