MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117259059 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_098641

Genetic architecture of the limbic white matter microstructure in aging and Alzheimer's Disease

2025· article· en· W7117259059 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Lorenz, Aditi Sathe, Yisu Yang, Alaina Durant, Yiyang Wu, Michael E. Kim, Chenyu Gao, Nancy R. Newlin, Karthik Ramadass, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Nazirah Mohd Khairi, Zhiyuan Li, Tianyuan Yao, Yuankai Z Huo, Logan Dumitrescu, Niranjana Shashikumar, Kimberly R. Pechman, Shannon L Risacher, Lori L. Beason‐Held, Yang An, Konstantinos Arfanakis, Guray Erus, Christos Davatzikos, Mohamad Habes, Di Wang, Duygu Tosun, Arthur W. Toga, Paul M. Thompson, Elizabeth C. Mormino, Panpan Zhang, Kurt Schilling, Marilyn S. S. Albert, Walter W. Kukull, Sarah Biber, Bennett A. Landman, Sterling C Johnson, Barbara B. Bendlin, Julie A Schneider, Lisa Laverne Barnes, David A. A. Bennett, Angela L. Jefferson, Susan M. Resnick, Andrew Joel Saykin, Timothy J. Hohman, Derek B. Archer, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), The BIOCARD Study Team, The Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP)

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseInflammationWhite matterGenetic architectureVascular diseaseSenescenceCellular architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Limbic white matter (WM) abnormalities are strongly elevated along the Alzheimer's Disease (AD) diagnostic continuum, but the underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to conduct a large‐scale genetic analysis of WM microstructure in older adults. Method WM was assessed in seven limbic tracts, including the cingulum, fornix, inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), uncinate fasciculus (UF), and transcallosal tracts of the inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyri (ITG, MTG, STG) using advanced diffusion MRI metrics corrected for free‐water (FW) (fractional anisotropy [FA FWcorr ], axial diffusivity [AxD FWcorr ], mean diffusivity [MD FWcorr ], radial diffusivity [RD FWcorr ]). Genetic associations with WM microstructure were investigated using harmonized data from seven aging cohorts, comprising 2,614 non‐Hispanic white older adults (mean age = 73.66 ± 9.76; 42.65% male), through SNP‐heritability estimation, genome‐wide association studies (GWAS), and post‐GWAS analyses (genetic correlation, gene‐level, and pathway analysis). Bulk RNA‐seq brain data were used to evaluate the relationship between expression of genes identified in the GWAS with cognition and AD pathologies. Result WM microstructure is heritable, with 16 of 35 metrics exhibiting estimates between 0.26 and 0.60 (p FDR <0.05). Genome‐wide associations ( p <5×10 −8 ) were observed for fornix AxD FWcorr (chr3, rs78407651), ILF FA FWcorr (chr15, rs8026709) and AxD FWcorr (chr15, rs8026709), STG RD FWcorr (chr10, rs11542181), and cingulum RD FWcorr (chr6, rs56017587). A locus with 38 genome‐wide significant SNPs (chr18, rs12959877) was associated with FA FWcorr and RD FWcorr (Figure 1). These SNPs are eQTLs for CDH19 , a gene highly expressed in oligodendrocytes with a role in cell adhesion. Among the genes identified in the GWAS, RORA , FAM107 and KC6 expression in brain tissues was linked to cognitive decline and AD pathologies (p FDR <.05). Gene‐level analysis highlighted SERPINA12 (z=4.60, p FDR =.03), a gene implicated in type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. Pathway analysis revealed associations with insulin, immune response, and neurotrophic signaling. Genetic correlations were identified with lipid profiles, cardiovascular traits, and neuropsychiatric conditions (p FDR <.05). Conclusion This study identified genetic factors related to cognition, vascular health, and inflammation as contributors to WM microstructure changes in aging and AD. These findings open avenues for future research on AD's molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for improving vascular and metabolic health in aging populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→