141P Clinical study of camrelizumab combined with SOX in adjuvant therapy for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Interim report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: D2 gastrectomy is the treatment of choice for resectable gastric cancer in East Asia.Existing evidence shows that adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery can improve patient survival.To further extend the disease-free survival (DFS) of gastric cancer patients, our study explores the synergistic effect of combining PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab with the SOX regimen in the adjuvant treatment setting. Conclusions:The combination of camrelizumab and the SOX regimen shows good potential for adjuvant therapy.The 2-year DFS rate is better than controls and has a controllable safety profile.Systemic inflammation markers (RDW/NLR) may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers.However, due to the limited number of events, further follow-up is needed.Clinical trial identification: NCT05184946.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".