MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117291796 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_104722

Do males and females show distinct symptoms in Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia?

2025· article· en· W7117291796 on OpenAlexaff
Xulin Liu, Sterre CM. de Boer, Carmela Tartaglia

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseCognitionPresentation (obstetrics)Frontotemporal dementiaCognitive decline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: An imbalanced sex ratio has been reported in sporadic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), along with differences in clinical symptoms between sporadic and genetic cases, particularly in females. We hypothesize that some females without genetic mutations may be misdiagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) due to atypical bvFTD symptom presentation. METHOD: We examined participants with probable or possible AD from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) dataset (N = 11,286, 5,923 females and 5,363 males). Sex differences in neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), and cognitive function was evaluated across major domains using standardized cognitive tests. Subgroup analyses were conducted for early-onset AD (age < 65 years, n = 1,465) and late-onset AD (n = 9,821). Analyses were corrected for age, disease severity, and education years. RESULT: Females exhibited more severe executive deficits (F (4, 11281) = 932.8, |β| = 0.084, p < 0.001) and depression (F (4, 11281) = 112.4, |β| = 0.080, p < 0.001) compared to males (Figure 1); while males exhibited more severe irritability (F (4, 11281) = 134.9, |β| = 0.15, p < 0.001), apathy (F (4, 11281) = 474.4, |β| = 0.14, p < 0.001), disinhibition (F (4, 11281) = 174.4, |β| = 0.062, p < 0.001), agitation (F (4, 11281) = 199, |β| = 0.067, p < 0.001) and nighttime behavioral disturbances (F (4, 11281) = 92.28, |β| = 0.072, p < 0.001). Males with early-onset AD were particularly more severe in symptoms of motor behavior disturbances, disinhibition and delusions. CONCLUSION: These findings reveal sex-related differences in the presentation of behavioral and cognitive symptoms in AD, with females displaying more executive deficits, and males exhibiting more behavioral disturbances. These differences may contribute to diagnostic misclassification, particularly in females with atypical bvFTD-like symptoms. Improved recognition of sex-related symptom variability is crucial for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and ensuring appropriate clinical management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207