MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117292944 · doi:10.1002/phar.70094

C‐Reactive Protein and Neutrophil‐To‐Lymphocyte Ratio: Can They Be Used Interchangeably in Tracking Clozapine‐Related Inflammation?

2025· article· en· W7117292944 on OpenAlexaff
Nicoline Bihelek, C. Bousman, William G. Honer, Reza Rafizadeh

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of CalgaryProvincial Health Services Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClozapineTracking (education)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Statistical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Clozapine initiation often triggers inflammatory responses that can alter metabolism via Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) suppression. Although C-reactive protein (CRP) is the recommended marker, it may be unavailable in community settings. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), routinely measured, could serve as a surrogate, though its value in detecting clozapine-related inflammation and metabolic changes remains unclear. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the relationship between CRP and NLR in individuals treated with clozapine, evaluate whether NLR can act as a proxy for elevated CRP (> 5 mg/L), and determine whether NLR, like CRP, explains variability in clozapine metabolism (concentration to dose (C/D) ratios) after adjusting for covariates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of clozapine-treated inpatients at the British Columbia Psychosis Program (2012-2021). Patients with clozapine levels and matched complete blood counts (CBCs) (±7 days) were included, with CRP added when available. Multivariate mixed models assessed associations between CRP, NLR, and clozapine C/D ratios, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses evaluated NLR as a proxy for elevated CRP. RESULTS: Among 150 patients, 760 clozapine serum/CBC pairs and 212 CRP measurements met eligibility criteria. NLR was modestly associated with CRP (estimate = 0.027, p < 0.001). ROC analysis indicated that NLR had limited predictive utility, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.640 for detecting CRP > 5 mg/L. Subsequent analyses for higher CRP thresholds (> 10 and > 20 mg/L) produced comparable NLR AUC values of 0.621 and 0.669, respectively. Neutrophil count alone demonstrated marginally better performance but remained similarly limited in predictive value. In multivariate models, CRP but not NLR, was independently associated with clozapine C/D ratios. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that although NLR and other hematological indices are easily accessible and may provide some indication of inflammation, they cannot substitute for CRP in guiding clozapine titration decisions. Where CRP is unavailable, NLR > 3 may be cautiously informative, though CRP remains the preferred marker for early detection and dose adjustment to optimize tolerability, adherence, and safety during clozapine initiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207