MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117293275 · doi:10.1016/j.pld.2025.12.012

Genomic insights into alpine plant adaptation

2025· article· en· W7117293275 on OpenAlex
Xu Yeyang Zhang, Tao Deng, Hengchang Wang, Hang Sun

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Diversity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Transposable elementConvergent evolutionGenomicsGenomeBiodiversityStructural variationPhenotypic plasticityFunctional genomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alpine plants persist in some of the harshest terrestrial environments, where low temperatures, high ultraviolet radiation, and short growing seasons impose strong selective pressures. Recent advances in genome sequencing and comparative genomics are unraveling the multifaceted mechanisms that enable their adaptation and diversification under these conditions. In this review, we synthesize current progress on how genetic variation at different levels, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), structural variants, whole-genome duplication, gene family evolution, and transposable elements, contribute to high-elevation adaptations in alpine plants. SNP-based studies have provided critical insights into adaptive differentiation along environmental gradients as well as molecular convergence underlying high-elevation adaptation, while analyses of structural variations and transposable elements reveal their potential roles in shaping phenotypic diversity and environmental responsiveness. Despite these advances, major challenges remain in linking genomic variation to functional adaptation, reflecting limitations in sampling, comparative frameworks, and functional validation. This review emphasizes the promise of integrative multi-omics, pangenome reconstruction, and functional assays to bridge these gaps, and highlights how genomic insights can guide the conservation of alpine biodiversity under accelerating climate change. • Genomic studies are transforming our understanding of diverse mechanisms by which alpine plants adapt to high-elevation environments. • Structural variants, whole-genome duplication, and gene family evolution underpin lineage-specific and convergent adaptations. • Transposable element dynamics contribute to genomic plasticity and stress responsiveness in alpine environments. • Integrative multi-omics and pangenomes offer new opportunities to link genomic variation with ecological function and conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it