MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117294229 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2025.3648375

Data and Model Hybrid Driven Non-Intrusive Wideband Impedance Measurement for LCC-HVDC Systems

2025· article· W7117294229 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Wang, Jinjie Lin, Zichen Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsRTDS Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandElectrical impedanceHarmonicGridElectric power systemHarmonic analysisBenchmark (surveying)System of measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Line commutated converter based high-voltage direct-current (LCC-HVDC) systems connected to weak grids are susceptible to wideband oscillations, threatening system stability. In this paper, a data driven modeling based non-intrusive wideband impedance measurement method is proposed for LCC-HVDC systems to monitor the dynamic characteristics of the receiving-end grid and assess the risk of wideband oscillations, without the need for additional primary equipment or external harmonic disturbances injection. First, the harmonic state-space (HSS) impedance model of LCC-HVDC is established, and the harmonic interaction mechanism between LCC system and the receiving-end grid is analyzed. Then, an impedance measurement method based on data-driven modeling is developed, incorporating an adaptive variable time-step (AVTS) sampling scheme and a dynamic frequency warping (DFW) technique to enable real-time assessment of oscillation risk profiles with reduced computational burden. Finally, the proposed method is validated by using the CIGRE benchmark system as well as the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207