MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117295039 · doi:10.1007/s00586-025-09675-2

Technical insights and implications of thoracolumbar spine and neural tissue harvesting in recently deceased organ donors: a direct anterior approach integrated into multi-organ procurement protocols

2025· article· en· W7117295039 on OpenAlexafffund
Paolo Brigato, Federico Cardahi, Kai Sheng, Hosni Cherif, Li Li, Christopher A Coluni, Kirby Upshaw, Jean Ouellet, Lisbet Haglund

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Spine Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCadaveric spasmNeurosurgeryCadaverSpinal cordIntervertebral discRadiographySpinal columnLumbar vertebraeClinical Practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To present a novel anterior surgical technique for harvesting thoracolumbar spinal tissue from cadaveric organ donors. The approach aims to ensure biological viability of harvested spinal tissue, while maintaining full compatibility with routine multi-organ procurement protocols. By addressing the limited availability of anterior harvesting methods, this technique aims to expand opportunities for high-quality experimental and translational spine research. METHODS: A direct anterior retroperitoneal approach was employed to harvest thoracolumbar spinal columns en bloc, including the spinal cord, dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, facet joints, and posterior elements. All extractions were performed within 1–2 h following aortic cross-clamping to minimize ischemic time. The surgical procedure included targeted osteotomies to preserve structural continuity, with intraoperative radiographic imaging performed to ensure alignment and suitability for subsequent research use. Tissue samples underwent same-day processing for experimental use, including viability assays to assess the cellular health of key structures. RESULTS: This harvesting protocol was applied in over 340 cadaveric donors as part of a high-volume organ donation program. The mean harvesting time was approximately 30 min. In all cases, structural continuity of the anterior spinal column was preserved, with radiographic imaging confirming appropriate alignment and completeness of the harvested specimens. Cell viability assessments demonstrated excellent preservation of biologically active components, including viable disc and joint tissues, neural structures, and resident cell populations. The harvested tissues have been successfully used in a variety of research projects. CONCLUSION: This anterior spinal harvesting technique is a safe, efficient, and highly reproducible method that can be seamlessly integrated into standard multi-organ procurement workflows. It enables the acquisition of sterile, anatomically intact, and biologically viable spinal tissues from cadaveric organ donors without compromising donor reconstruction or surgical logistics. This approach substantially enhances the availability and quality of human spinal specimens for research and may serve as a useful model for tissue recovery in the field of spine science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Spine JournalSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207