Designing a Reusable Pipeline Architecture for Cross-Domain Simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulation and digital twin (DT) technologies are powerful tools for analyzing complex systems, but their creation is often slow, costly and highly dependent on expert knowledge. Current methods provide strong support for the design and execution phases, yet very little attention has been given to automatically linking the two. As a result, most simulations are developed as one-off solutions that are difficult to reuse across domains. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a reusable and modular pipeline architecture for automated simulation generation. The approach defines a step-by-step workflow that begins with abstraction and conceptual modeling, passes through formal specification and validation, and ends with deployment in cloud-based environments. To support the relevance of this work, the paper also analyzes ten highly cited review articles on simulation and DT architectures published between 2020 and 2025, showing that automated generation is the least developed stage in the lifecycle. By combining semantic modeling, process mining, and cloud deployment strategies, the proposed architecture lowers the barrier to simulation development and provides a pathway toward scalable, cross-domain, and “digital twin-ready” solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it