MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117303017 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_106523

Effects of in vivo Lewy body pathology on neuropsychiatric symptoms across the Alzheimer's disease continuum

2025· article· en· W7117303017 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Teixeira Leffa, Guilherme Povala, Pamela C.L. Ferreira, João Pedro Ferrari‐Souza, Guilherme Bauer‐Negrini, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Lívia Amaral, Firoza Z Lussier, Marina Scop Medeiros, Carolina Soares, Arthur C. Macedo, Joseph Therriault, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Dana Tudorascu, Eduardo R. Zimmer, Bruna Bellaver, Tharick A. Pascoal

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseasePsychosisIn vivoClinical trialDementiaClinical neurologyLewy body

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, co‐pathology is frequently observed, with Lewy body (LB) pathology among the most common findings. Post‐mortem studies support a higher frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with AD and LB co‐pathology. To date, however, the effects of LB pathology measured in vivo on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD is underexplored. Here, we evaluated the cross‐sectional and longitudinal effects of in vivo measured LB pathology on neuropsychiatric symptoms across the AD continuum. Method We analyzed data from a total of 1,169 individuals from ADNI (426 cognitively unimpaired and 743 cognitively impaired; 47.13% women; mean age of 73.05 years). All participants had baseline in vivo LB pathology measured through CSF alpha‐synuclein seed amplification assays, as well as neuropsychiatric assessments using the NPI‐Q for up to 10 years. A subgroup of 977 participants had baseline CSF amyloid‐β (Aβ 1‐42 ) and p ‐tau 181 levels. We explored cross‐sectional and longitudinal effects of LB on neuropsychiatric symptoms using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression models, respectively. Analyses were controlled for age, sex, and cognitive status. We further evaluated the independent effects of LB, Aβ and tau by including all three pathologies in the same model. Result In cross‐sectional analyses at baseline, the presence of LB pathology was associated with higher rates of anxiety (OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.13‐2.29, p ‐value=0.008), apathy (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.17‐2.36, p ‐value=0.008), motor disturbances (OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.18‐3.24, p ‐value=0.008), and appetite disturbances (OR=1.63, 95% CI=1.11‐2.40, p ‐value=0.01) after correcting for multiple comparisons (Figure 1). In longitudinal analyses, the presence of LB pathology was associated with a higher risk of developing psychosis (HR=2.15, 95% CI=1.30‐3.56, p ‐value=0.003) and anxiety (HR=1.70, 95% CI=1.22‐2.36, p ‐value=0.001, Figure 2). The cross‐sectional and longitudinal effects of LB were independent of Aβ or tau. Conclusion Our results suggest that in vivo‐measured LB pathology is associated with a higher frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms, with apathy, motor disturbances, appetite changes, anxiety, and psychosis as potential early neuropsychiatric manifestations of LB pathology in individuals across the AD continuum. These findings underscore the potential of in vivo LB detection as a marker for identifying individuals at elevated risk of neuropsychiatric symptoms, both in clinical trials and in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→