MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117304101 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_105968

Head‐to‐head trajectories of MK6240, Flortaucipir, and plasma <i>p</i> ‐tau217 as a function of Aβ

2025· article· en· W7117304101 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna Bellaver, Guilherme Povala, Pamela C.L. Ferreira, Guilherme Bauer‐Negrini, Firoza Z Lussier, Lívia Amaral, Andreia Rocha, Carolina Soares, Joseph C. Masdeu, Dana Tudorascu, Thomas K Karikari, David Soleimani‐Meigooni, Juan M. Fortea, Val J. Lowe, Hwamee Oh, Belén Pascual, Brian A. Gordon, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Suzanne L. Baker, Tharick A. Pascoal

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmaFunction (biology)CognitionTrajectoryPlasma levels

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tau PET tracers present distinct binding characteristics that might influence their trajectories and relationship with other biomarkers along the AD continuum. In a head-to-head study, we investigated the relationship between the emergence of PET tracers MK6240 and Flortaucipir, and plasma p-tau217 abnormalities as a function of Aβ PET deposition. We further assessed the concordance between tau PET and plasma p-tau217 positivity and its relationship with cognitive scores. METHOD: We evaluated 352 individuals from the HEAD study (205 cognitively unimpaired and 147 cognitively impaired) with Aβ PET, MK6240 and Flortaucipir tau PET, and plasma p-tau217 (ALZpath) and GFAP (Quanterix) measures. Tau PET Braak regions, plasma p-tau217 trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Biomarkers were z-scored anchored on young individuals (n = 19, < 28 years old) as anchors. Tau PET (Braak 1 region) and plasma p-tau217 were considered positive/abnormal when surpassing 2.5 z-score. RESULT: Among the tested markers, MK6240 was the earliest to show abnormality as a function of Centiloid, occurring at 22 Centiloids, followed by plasma p-tau217 at 38 Centiloid and Flortaucipir at Centiloid 56 (Figure 1). Tau PET and plasma p-tau217 positivity showed an overall high concordance (∼80% for both tracers; Figure 2). In MK6240 discordant cases, most individuals were MK6240+/p-tau217- (13.8%), while 6.6% were MK6240-/p-tau217+ (Figure 2A). For Flortaucipir, 15% of discordant cases were Flortaucipir-/p-tau217+, while 4.8% were Flortaucipir+/p-tau217- (Figure 2B). The discordant groups present higher Centiloid than the ptau217-/Tau- group and overall decreased scores in cognitive tests, except for p-tau217+/MK6240- group (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: MK6240 becomes abnormal at lower levels of Aβ burden compared to plasma p-tau217 and Flortaucipir. The relatively high prevalence of discordant tau PET positive or plasma p-tau217 positive and suggests that some individuals may show tau PET positivity first, while others may exhibit plasma p-tau217 positivity first. The distinct cognitive profiles of this groups suggest potential clinical relevance, warranting further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→