Saphenous Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain: A Case Series with Preliminary Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability in older adults and presents a growing burden as the population ages.While conservative treatments and genicular nerve ablation offer relief for many, a subset of patients continue to experience refractory symptoms.Pulsed radiofrequency ablation (P-RFA) of the saphenous nerve at the adductor canal has emerged as a potential intervention for patients with persistent medial knee pain, yet its clinical efficacy remains underexplored.Methods: Patients with refractory knee pain related to osteoarthritis who received RFA of the saphenous nerve at the adductor canal if they had previously failed conservative measures, including genicular radiofrequency ablation were extracted from institutional data.Patients received ultrasound-guided RFA of the saphenous nerve using a 20 g 3.5 inches RFA probe.Baseline demographics, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical functional scores were recorded at baseline and at follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months.Patient improvement and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was analyzed at each follow up.Results: A total of 12 patients were included.The average NRS pain intensity was significantly reduced from baseline to 4.2 ± 1.8 after 3 months (P < 0.0001) and 3.0 ± 1.0 after 6 months (P < 0.0001).The average WOMAC physical function was significantly improved from baseline to 29.3 ± 7.5 after 3 months (P < 0.0001) and 20.3 ± 6.7 (P < 0.0001) after 6 months.Of our 12 patients, 42% reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in NRS pain improvement after 3 months, and 83% after 6 months.Regarding the WOMAC function score, 17% reached the MCID after 3 months, and 75% after 6 months.Conclusions: This case series contributes to the body of literature suggesting RFA of the saphenous nerve at the adductor canal may be a successful treatment option for chronic knee pain related to osteoarthritis refractory to conservative measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".