MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117308540 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_105868

Muscle Function and Cognitive Performance in Autosomal Dominant AlzheimerDisease Insights from the PSEN1‐E280A Colombian Kindred

2025· article· en· W7117308540 on OpenAlexaff
Elkin Garcia‐Cifuentes, Juan Camilo Becerra‐Mateus, Claudia Aponte, Díaz Vásquez, Paula Ospina, Claudia Cristina Araújo Muñoz, Yamile Bocanegra, Sonia Do Carmo, David Fernando Aguillón Niño, A. Claudio Cuello, Yakeel T. Quiroz

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCognitive declineGaitAffect (linguistics)Function (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Carriers of the PSEN1-E280A variant, the largest known autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) cohort, typically experience mild cognitive impairment by age 44 and dementia by 49. Emerging evidence suggests gait speed (GS) may be an early marker of cognitive decline. While past research focused on older adults, recent studies explore muscle decline in younger individuals. This study examines the relationship between GS and cognition within the Colombian PSEN1-E280A cohort. METHOD: The study included 134 individuals from families affected by early-onset ADAD with the PSEN1 gene variant. Among them, 66 were carriers (including 5 with mild cognitive impairment and 5 with dementia), while 68 were non-carriers. The participants had a mean age of 32 years (SD = 8.72), with 49.3% being male. Cognitively-unimpaired status was defined by Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) scores <2. Muscle function was assessed through single-task GS, and its association with cognitive function and functional stages was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore these relationships. RESULT: The carrier group had a mean GS of 1.56 m/s, compared to 1.64 m/s for the non-carrier group (p = 0.307). On the MMSE, all carriers scored an average of 26.55 (SD = 4.56), while non-carriers scored 28.81 (SD = 1.24), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). GS was significantly slower in the cognitively-impaired group compared to cognitively-unimpaired group (1.37 m/s vs. 1.63 m/s; p = 0.042). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a weak positive correlation between GS and MMSE (r = 0.18; p = 0.041), with this effect being more pronounced in the impaired group. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that single-task GS does not differentiate young individuals with ADAD due to PSEN1-E280A but is significantly associated with global cognitive function, particularly in cognitively-impaired individuals. This suggests that gait impairments emerge as cognitive decline progresses, consistent with findings in sporadic Alzheimer's disease, where motor dysfunction often appears in early symptomatic stages. These results reinforce the link between motor decline and cognitive impairment. Further research is needed to explore the interplay between cognitive and physical performance in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→