MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117308903 · doi:10.1002/alz70858_104314

Rare Dementia Support Canada: Localizing and mobilizing knowledge to build inclusive supports for families affected by atypical dementias

2025· article· en· W7117308903 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mary Pat Sullivan, Sebastian J. Crutch, Veronika Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaDiversity (politics)Work (physics)MEDLINEDyad

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Literature on how to use theory, evidence and experience to practically develop and implement new interventions for people affected by dementia is scarce. Rare Dementia Support (RDS) is an evidence-informed support community in the UK for people living with a rare dementia, their families, and dementia care practitioners working in the health and social care sectors. The RDS Impact Study (2019-24) and the growth of RDS shed new light on the community's characteristics to facilitate a tailored, relational, and continuous model of support. The funding of RDS Canada in 2022 offered an opportunity to localize the model in another jurisdiction. Its implementation was informed by participatory, culturally centred and place-based solutions. METHOD: Following a 2-year implementation phase and using RDS program theory we conducted an evaluation of RDS Canada's principal activities with its growing membership (∼800 people) and support team. Using multiple data sources and methods, including case studies, an interrogation of administrative data, satisfaction surveys and interviews with staff and advisory circle members (N = 17), we explored delivery, reach and implementation successes and challenges across peoples and geography. RESULT: People affected by rare dementia living in Canada highlighted a preference for self-directed support characterized by disease or syndrome, age, and stage, and that provided 'side by side' emotional, practical and informational support. Whilst the vitality of the RDS model in Canada was reinforced, as anticipated, the data reinforced the role of pre- and post-diagnostic support that was flexibly available considering family status, culture, language and geography. In a context of shrinking health resources, support that was directed on building member self-advocacy skills emerged as new and critical contribution to program theory. CONCLUSION: The localization and mobilization of knowledge to support people affected by rare dementia providing promising results to continue to develop and expand delivery for diverse populations across diverse geographies in Canada. A newly funded realist evaluation of RDS Canada is now underway to further explore diversity through varied configurations of what supports work for whom, when, and where.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→