Global mental health-building capacity and developing links to support postgraduate training in psychiatry in Zambia: Zambia-Ireland Psychiatry Academic Collaboration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper outlines the experience of establishing a partnership for clinical services and academic training across two very different countries: Zambia and Ireland. Drawing upon the experience of setting up other similar international partnerships, the process of understanding the two very different cultural and clinical contexts has developed collaboratively over the course of the past 2 years, and has resulted in valuable insights and joint working. In line with local priorities, the Zambian colleagues in the partnership have prioritised the support for postgraduate training in psychiatry to enable the expansion of services, and allow greater population access. In particular, there is evidence of unmet need in the areas of substance use psychiatry, and child and adolescent psychiatry.The collaboration will increase cultural awareness among psychiatrists and trainees in Ireland and deepen their knowledge and understanding of international psychiatry. This programme is mutually beneficial and has the potential to greatly improve relationships between the mental health service providers of the two nations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".