MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117310457 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_105745

The Contribution of LATE‐NC to Neuropsychiatric Symptom Burden in Alzheimer's Disease and Lewy Body Disease: A Clinicopathological Study

2025· article· en· W7117310457 on OpenAlexaff
Yara Alkhodair, Imogene Scott, Abdulrahman Alzahrani, Paula Villela Nunes, Ian R. Mackenzie, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthPositive Living Society of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseLewy bodyAutopsyCohortLewy body diseaseCohort studyDegenerative disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathological change (LATE-NC) frequently coexists with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Lewy body disease (LBD), and vascular pathology. While neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD/LATE-NC are beginning to be explored, the impact of LATE-NC in mixed AD/LBD and LBD is still underexamined. This study investigated neuropsychiatric symptom profiles in individuals with AD, LBD, and mixed AD/LBD with and without LATE-NC. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study, individuals from the UBC Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer's and Related Disorders (UBCH-CARD) autopsy database with AD, LBD or both plus LATE-NC pathology (LATE+, n = 42) were matched by age and neuropathology to controls without LATE-NC (LATE-, n = 38). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) at initial, intermediate, and final visits before death. Outcomes included symptom severity scores at the final visit, odds ratios of symptoms at the final visit and trajectories of symptom progression. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to compare symptom severity scores, while linear mixed-effects models analyzed longitudinal symptom data, adjusting for age, sex, education, and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). RESULT: Mean age at death was 80.5 years (LATE+) and 77.9 years (LATE-), and participants were followed on average 5.8 years. Both groups had a high burden of moderate-to-severe AD pathology (LATE+ 97.6% vs. LATE- 94.4%) and moderate numbers had neocortical LBD (31.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.50). At the final visit, total NPI-Q severity scores were similar between groups (5.65 vs. 6.12, p = 0.71). Symptom severity scores for apathy (0.73 vs. 1.29, p = 0.01), hallucinations (0.24 vs. 0.82, p = 0.01), and appetite changes (0.08 vs. 0.41, p = 0.04) were lower in LATE+. Odds ratios for symptom presence at the final visit, adjusted for coexisting pathology, remained significant for hallucinations only (0.013, 95% CI 0.001-0.218, p = 0.002). Longitudinal modeling showed no significant differences in total burden of neuropsychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSION: LATE-NC did not appear to increase overall neuropsychiatric symptom burden in this autopsy cohort study of individuals with AD and/or LBD. Hallucinations were less frequent in the LATE+ group, but this may be due to incomplete adjustment for coexisting Lewy Body pathology. Further modelling of longitudinal symptom progression will be presented at the conference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→